|
Goals for year 2009-2010 and 2010-2011
1. Increase the number of students in the intermediate and high levels in reading, math, and science- This goal was not met at every level in each discipline. The discussion revolved round the wording of the goal. This committee would like to track a year's growth for each member of the class. Committee members want all students to improve by a year's growth, but realize that those students scoring at the top will not be able to be included. Our results are represented in the table.
| Grade | Reading Comp | Math | Science
| | 3 | Yes | Yes | Yes
| | 4 | No | No | No (100%) | | 5 | No | Same | No
| | 6 | Yes | Yes | Yes
| | 7 | Yes | No | Same | 8
| No | No
| No (100%)
|
- Goal One: Increase the scores of every student by one year's growth in reading, math, and science.
2. Identify students scoring below the 41 percentile and provide remedial services. Analyze future scores of these students to track growth.- The committee feels that this is an important goal. Results are represented in the following table
| Grade | Reading Comp 2009-2010
| Math 2009-2010
| Science see note below*
| | | Non- Prof.
| Non- Prof. | Achieved
| Non- Prof. | Non- Prof. | Achieved | Non- Prof. | Non- Prof. | Achieved
| | 4 | 2 | 1 | Yes
| 3 | 1 | Yes | | | | | 5 | 2 | 1 | Yes | 1
| 0 | Yes | | | | | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | 1 | 0 | Yes | | | | | 7 | 5 | 4 | Yes | 6 | 4 | Yes
| | | | | 8 | 3 | 2
| Yes | 3 | 1
| | | | |
- Thirteen students were on the non-proficient list in reading and only 2 did not show growth. We did add seven different students to the reading list
- Fourteen students were on the non-proficient list in math and all showed growth but six were still non-proficient. We added only one new name to the list
*Of the seven students that were non-proficient, all reach proficiency; however, four other students will be on the list next year. The committee feels we reached this goal, but that it should remain a priority for next year as well - Goal Two: Identify students scoring below the 41 percentile and provide remedial services. Analyze future scores of these students to track growth
3. Identify students who are TAG and instruct students.
- Because of the job changes at the beginning of the year, no individual enrichment classes were taught. Teachers were made aware of the students with 85% or higher scores. The committee feels that more enrichment or enhanced lessons would be taught. With the entire year of professional feels this goal will be addressed in every classroom.
- Goal Three: Identify Students scoring at or above 85% and provide enrichment for those students. Analyze scores to track growth.
4. Staff development will be dedicated to studetn achievement 80% of the time
- This goal was met and will continue next year as we add inservice time to our calendar and utilize AEA staff to instruct staff
- Goal Four: Staff development will be dedicated to student achievement 80% of the time using the Iowa Professional Development Modelt o track results.
5. Continue to follow diocesan standards and benchmarks and align curriculum to those standards and benchmarks
- This goal was met and will be improved as we work with the Department of Education to implement the Iowa Core.
- Goal Five: Continue to follow diocesan standards and benchmarks and align curriculum ans assessments with Iowa Core.
|
